OSPI · Adopted August 6, 2026

English Language Arts

Reading, writing, speaking, language, and a new Research and Media Literacy domain, organized around genre.

275
standards
125
priority
48
new in 2026

Pick a grade

Find a ELA standard

What changed

OSPI's summary of the shifts from Common Core.

The WA ELA 2026 Updates the CCSS by

  • Integrating foundational and comprehension skills.
  • Shifting from text types to genres.
  • Intentionally aligning with structured literacy.
  • Elevating media literacy by creating a dedicated Research & Media Literacy domain.
  • Adding digital forum formats as authentic communication environments.
  • Supporting connection to purpose and context across domains.

Updates to the Reading Domain

  • Foundational skills are placed in the context of a language and print-rich environment.
  • Literary and informational texts are combined and reorganized around existing and emerging genres.
  • Text features expand into grades 6–12.
  • Reading links to research, discussion, writing, and real-life applications.

Updates to the Writing Domain

  • Composes genres that combine text types with flexibility.
  • Persuasion broadened beyond argument.
  • Alignment to WIDA’s English Language Development (ELD) Standards.
  • Emphasis on applying the writing process to unfamiliar genres and real-world writing tasks, and in other content areas.
  • Addition of digital citizenship, permanence of digital publishing and ethical use of others’ creative work.

Updates to the Language Domain

  • Emphasizes how and why people use language differently in different settings.
  • Encoding and transcription are added.

Updates to the Speaking, Listening, and Digital Forums Domain

  • Includes online discussion formats as well as face-to-face discussion.
  • Digital citizenship added, including permanence of digital contributions, online anonymity, and authenticity in digital forums.
  • Emphasizes civic discourse in multiple formats.

Adding Research and Media Literacy Domain

  • Students begin asking and refining research questions in elementary grades.
  • Introduces curiosity as part of inquiry.
  • Expanded use of digital search tools.
  • Encourages independent critical thinking about media messages.
  • Students analyze reactions to media messages, purposes of media messages, content accuracy, and source credibility.

The domains

Reading R

51 standards

The reading standards ask students to read across a wide variety of genres. Literary and informational texts are combined and reorganized around genre including emerging genres (e.g. social media posts) beyond the categories of literary or informational. In Kindergarten through 5th grade, standards for foundational skills are placed in the context of a language and print-rich environment. Students build greater phonological awareness and accurate decoding skills, using phonics and word analysis to build fluency. Text/visual features expand into grades 6–12, teaching students to “decode” genre-specific visual elements. From Kindergarten through high school, these standards are followed by standards for comprehension, interpretation, analysis, and evaluation of texts.

Writing W

65 standards

The writing standards empower students to compose a wide range of genres for varied purposes and audiences. Although argument is one form of persuasion, the standards recognize that many persuasive genres use distinct techniques. Informative, explanatory, and narrative writing are also included as flexible genre categories rather than fixed text types. This expanded view of writing aligns with shifts in the reading standards and deepens the inclusion of media literacy. The writing standards also introduce digital citizenship, prompting students to consider the permanence of their writing and the range of intended and unintended audiences. With a process-oriented approach, the standards help students consider the communicative situation and prepare them to write unfamiliar genres in the future. In the Writing domain, the standards proceed from identifying the purpose to planning and drafting, revising and editing, and sharing and publishing. This reflects the recursive nature of composing and developing writing over time. To increase relevance, students are invited to compose complex texts that reflect real-world communication, including: • Academic writing – structured, evidence-based texts. • Professional communication – resumes, emails, proposals, and workplace documentation. • Personal expression – reflective writing, personal letters, journaling, and storytelling. • Civic discourse – opinion pieces, public commentary, and advocacy writing.

Speaking, Listening, and Digital Forums SLDF

55 standards

The speaking, listening, and digital forums standards emphasize the importance of engaging students in meaningful, respectful communication—both in person and online. While digital forums resemble conversation more than traditional writing, they introduce unique opportunities that need students to apply and expand their social-emotional learning and digital citizenship skills. To participate effectively, students must navigate the complexities of online discourse, including: • Civil discourse skills used in person and digital format discussions. • Permanence of digital conversations and their long-term impact. • Anonymity and authenticity can influence behavior and accountability. • Social-emotional competencies such as self-awareness, social management, and engagement. By integrating digital citizenship into these standards, educators prepare students for the realities of communication in a digital age.

Language L

53 standards

The language standards support students to develop their knowledge and use of the English language in different contexts for different purposes. Language skills and knowledge develop within the literacy activities represented by the other domains. The language standards emphasize the context in which students develop language skills and knowledge. Students learn how language works across contexts and social situations to convey meaning. Students use syntax, vocabulary, and word relationships to interpret and express ideas with clarity and precision. Students also apply encoding and transcription skills—such as spelling, punctuation, and written conventions—to communicate effectively in writing. In addition, language standards are written to be easy to use in dual-language settings and include connections to the Key Language Uses found in the WIDA English Language Development framework.

Research and Media Literacy RML

51 standards

The research and Inquiry standards accurately reflect real-world uses for the inquiry process. Students can write about research but can also use it to inform decisions and discussions, satisfy curiosity, inspire creative work, and provide context for the texts they read and study. Putting research and media literacy into a single domain emphasizes the need to identify credible and relevant sources during the research process. Students encounter countless media messages all day long. The media literacy standards do not tell students what to think about media messages and information sources. Instead, media literacy standards teach students to use their own lenses to analyze: • Reactions to media messages. • Purposes of media messages and the techniques used to accomplish them. • Accuracy/logic/fairness of media messages. • Credibility of those responsible for media messages. These media literacy standards help students think critically about media messages so they can make their own informed choices about what to believe and what actions to take. As students consider their reactions to media messages, they rely on and build skills associated with social-emotional learning.

WIDA language connections

OSPI connects 275 of the 275 ELA standards to the WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework (2020), 504 connections in all. Each one names how students use language in that standard, so a content teacher and a multilingual learner teacher can plan language objectives together. Every standard card carries its connections under Resources, and every grade page sums them up under Language demands.

A WIDA connection on ELA.6.R.4

ELD standard

Standard 2: Language for Language Arts

WIDA has five ELD standards, one for social and instructional language and one for the language of each content area: language arts, mathematics, science and social studies.

Interpret language arts narratives by… Identifying a theme or central idea that develops over the course of a text

Reading a connection

  • Interpretive is taking language in: listening, reading and viewing. Expressive is putting it out: speaking, writing and representing.
  • The expectation is the sentence a connection starts with, and each language function under it finishes it: a way students show that language.
  • ELD-LA is Standard 2, Language for Language Arts (344 connections), ELD-SI is Standard 1, Language for Social and Instructional Purposes (159 connections) and ELD-SC is Standard 4, Language for Science (1 connection).
  • OSPI calls these example connections: a starting point, not the only language a standard asks for.

Narrate

148 standards

Telling what happened: stories, events and experiences, in order.

Interpretive
46
Expressive
82
Social and instructional
50

Inform

152 standards

Giving facts about a topic: defining, describing, comparing and classifying.

Interpretive
64
Expressive
96
Social and instructional
15

Explain

59 standards

Accounting for how or why: how something works, why it happens, how a problem was solved.

Expressive
1
Social and instructional
58

Argue

63 standards

Taking a position, backing it with evidence and reasoning, and weighing other positions.

Interpretive
20
Expressive
21
Social and instructional
22

Go further

Language expectations and functions from the WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework, 2020 Edition, © 2020 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, as connected to the standards by OSPI.

For families

OSPI's one-page guide to each grade, in seven languages.

From OSPI

Documents, videos and handouts. OSPI keeps the full list on its English Language Arts standards page.

Standards text, priority flags, the Common Core crosswalk and the linked resources are published by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI). PRISM is an independent tool, not affiliated with or endorsed by OSPI. The Standards for Mathematical Practice text is from the Common Core State Standards.

Check OSPI's documents before anything official. Back to the standards hub